Hi and welcome to my site!

I'm Mikael, a software engineer based in Helsinki. I build software applications and enjoy exploring emerging technologies. This website serves as my blog and a place to share projects and ideas, which are anything but software development. If you like to see my hobby software projects, go to my Github account.

Here you can read my thoughts about almost everything and especially scientific topics. I imagine the world as a closed, hierachical system, where broader categories dominate smaller categories. Thus the broadest category, the universe, defines the possible and impossible for the lower categories, for example the existence of life, what is right and what wrong, is the reality chaos or harmony or what is matter really. Then we continue into lower categories like what are the possible sources of energy for civilizations to use, should human kind use fuels, what should be done for the climate and the weather, why do we need legislation, the importance of land planning and so on. Finally, we reach the very everyday categories like how to produce and consume fuel or how to build houses the right way.

Thus, the broadest category, the universe, is somewhat religious question for a primitive society until knowledge and observations will correct it into the right universe model, and we talk no more about religion but science. The current scientific universe model or models human kind has, those so called "expanding universe models" which started in a Big Bang, represent chaos and the structurelessness of the world: according to those models, no one can derive a logical structure from the model of the universe down to a model of how humanity should operate. But my texts shown in this site prove (or I hope they prove, tell me if you find an error there) that universe does not need to be born in a Big Bang. Actually, Big Bang never existed! Instead of using commonly known universe models, I have created my own universe model based on the scientific observations, and that model makes categorical deriving possible.

I have classified the pages in this site into three categories: Generalities, Intermediates and Details. Generalities contains broader category topics, for example my Universe text is there. Intermediates are topics, which have a very broad scope of impact, but which alone are not capable of defining a functioning system. Einstein's General Relativity is an example of this. Then we have Details: these are usually technical innovations or mathematical representations for some specific purpose. For example, the Ideal Construction principle applied to a wooden house is an example of this.

Currently, there aren't many pages published here, but several topics are in the works. However, I do this alone as a hobby, so it may take long until I get new text ready. These topics aren't easy to write: I'm trying to write real innovations, not fairy tales. I cannot know beforehand, is some idea even possible and of course I don't know it even after the text is written. It cannot be known until the idea is scientifically tested.Right now I have a tricky problem to solve with my climate model..